Register
Why should a historian be cautious about using primary sources
137k views
3 votes
Why should a historian be cautious about using primary sources

User Darshan Mehta
by
6.7k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

I personally think some of the information can be biased based on who wrote it.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Meagan
by
8.7k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Simbian
asked Oct 21, 2024 158k views
When writing an informative essay. Why is it necessary to have credible sources?
Simbian asked Oct 21, 2024
by Simbian
8.5k points
1 answer
3 votes
158k views
User Miko Kronn
asked Aug 25, 2022 20.2k views
What does the E stand for in proven method evaluating sources
Miko Kronn asked Aug 25, 2022
by Miko Kronn
9.1k points
1 answer
3 votes
20.2k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!