39.6k views
2 votes
1. Why does Mitchell say that the labor movement is essentially a "moral movement"?

User HMM
by
5.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I think she (correctly) means that the owners or stockholders were forced not to exploit workers. They below, are the owners.

  • They could not underpay them
  • They could not provide housing which they over charged them for.
  • They could not provide housing that only the rats and mice felt comfortable living in.
  • They could not have working conditions what were essentially unsafe by any standard.
  • They could not have children working in the mines.

It is only right that owners treat labor with respect and dignity. Those are words employed by morality.

User Ovidijus Parsiunas
by
5.6k points