Question

In the Mapp v. Ohio case, the Supreme Court ruled it illegal for courts to accept evidence that was taken without a warrant. The court's decision protects the rights of U.S. citizens by

A. allowing wealthy citizens accused of a crime to stay in nicer jails.
B. taking away the government's right to confiscate illegal goods.
C. preventing the police from taking evidence whenever they want.
D. giving citizens time to call their lawyer after being arrested.

Answer 1

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The court's decision prevents the police from taking evidence without a warrant. The police must ask a judge for a warrant. The judge serves as a barrier from police officers taking evidence at any time they want.