Final answer:
Napoleon's legacy is complex, with both positive and negative aspects. While he achieved military victories and implemented reforms, his aggressive expansion and authoritarian leadership also had negative consequences.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking if Napoleon deserves to be called great and to provide three specific pieces of evidence to support a position. In response to this, it is important to consider both the positive and negative aspects of Napoleon's legacy.
Positive Evidence:
- Napoleon was a skilled military strategist who won numerous battles and expanded the French Empire. This can be seen in his successful campaigns like the Battle of Austerlitz.
- Napoleon implemented significant reforms in France, such as the Napoleonic Code, which helped to modernize the legal system and bring about more equality.
- His impact on European politics cannot be denied. He established a new order in Europe and his influence can still be seen today.
Negative Evidence:
- Napoleon's aggressive expansion led to the loss of countless lives and the suffering of many people.
- His leadership style was often authoritarian and he curtailed many civil liberties during his rule.
- Napoleon's military ambitions ultimately led to his downfall and the loss of the French Empire.
In conclusion, whether or not Napoleon deserves to be called great is subjective and depends on individual perspectives. While he achieved significant military and political successes, his actions also had negative consequences. It is important to consider both sides when evaluating his legacy.