183k views
4 votes
When the founders were creating a new American government, the abuses

of power from a single ruler were fresh in their minds. They didn't want
another king! So the United States government was designed to prevent any
single person or group from becoming too powerful. We call this idea
"separation of powers."
The Constitution separates the government's power into three branches.
Each branch has separate responsibilities, but they all must interact with
each other in different ways. This separation of powers includes a system of
checks and balances, which are ways that each branch can limit the others.
Based on the passage, the founders of the United States would most likely agree with
which of the following statements?
A
Kings do not have enough power.
B
Kings can take advantage of their power.
с
A government should have few checks and balances.
D
The branches of government do not need to interact.

User Lars Bohl
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

B . Kings can take advantage of their power.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given passage, we can assume that the primary goal of establishing the Constitution was for the "separation" of powers among various branches. This was done with the idea of making sure that power is not concentrated in just one area or person.

The separation of government's powers into three branches ensures equal level of authority. Moreover, the statement "They didn't want another king!" provides a supporting point to the separation of the power. So, by the act of this power separation, the founders of the United States would most likely agree with the statement that kings can take advantage of their powers, which is what the founders are trying to prevent.

Thus, the correct answer is option B.

User Jinna Baalu
by
5.1k points