5.5k views
5 votes
Use what you have learned in completing the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. Part 1 sheet to write a well-developed essay that answers the following question—Was Congress correct in approving the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution? Your essay should include a thesis statement. Consider the following as you outline the essay: How does the Constitution address declaring and waging war? What was the conflict in Vietnam like up to August 1964? What was President Johnson's view of communism in Southeast Asia? What allegedly happened in the Gulf of Tonkin? What actually happened? How should Congress handle similar situations in the future? You will be graded on content, organization, and spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Answer​

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer: Yes, but they should have been less vague. They should have increased armaments on ships and increased base security, rather than protecting the troops by any means necessary because this caused the US to be involved in Vietnam.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Nijat Aliyev
by
5.4k points
6 votes

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed by the U.S. Congress in August 1964, marked a pivotal moment in American involvement in the Vietnam War.

What did the Gulf of Tonkin incident show ?

The resolution granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to take military action in Southeast Asia without a formal declaration of war, and its approval by Congress has been a subject of historical debate.

First and foremost, the Constitution of the United States grants Congress the power to declare war, a principle enshrined in Article I, Section 8. However, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution represented a deviation from this constitutional mandate, as it provided the President with broad authority to use military force without a formal declaration of war.

The alleged events in the Gulf of Tonkin involved reported attacks on U.S. Navy ships by North Vietnamese vessels. These incidents, while initially accepted as factual, have since been questioned, with evidence suggesting that the second reported attack may not have occurred.

In handling similar situations in the future, Congress must exercise its constitutional responsibility to declare war or authorize military action with a clear understanding of the facts and objectives.

Vigilance in questioning the accuracy of information provided by the executive branch is essential to prevent the misuse of military force and ensure that Congress's decisions align with the nation's best interests.

User Mohammad Zamanian
by
4.8k points