156k views
4 votes
The best scientific reason for a scientist to accept a specific theory is -

that research and observations support the theory
o to gain recognition as a great scientist
because there can only be one correct theory
D to obtain funding for the research

User Kevpie
by
6.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

that research and observations support the theory.

Explanation:

Science can be defined as a branch of intellectual and practical study which systematically observe a body of fact in relation to the structure and behavior of non-living and living organisms (animals, plants and humans) in the natural world through experiments.

A control experiment can be defined as an experiment in which a condition assumed to be a probable cause of the effect is being compared to the same situation by the scientist without involving or using the suspected condition.

A hypothesis is considered to be tentative or an educated guess and can be defined as a testable explanation for an observation or a scientific problem. An example of a hypothesis is saying, Corona virus is caused by the introduction of the "5G" technology.

This ultimately implies that, for any hypothesis to be acceptable in science, it must be supported by observations and the results of control experiments; this give rise to factual informations, theories and by extension solutions to problems.

A power analysis should always be conducted before the collection of data because it will help you as a researcher to determine the smallest sample size that's accurate enough to detect the effect of a specific test at the desired statistical significance level.

Hence, the best scientific reason for a scientist to accept a specific theory is that research and observations support the theory.

User Jonnycowboy
by
6.0k points