Question

People clearly enjoy watching reality shows judging from their ratings, but even more than that, people enjoy being ON reality shows. I want my chance to know that enjoyment firsthand. I know it will kill my mom to watch me willingly walk into a group of people, some of whom were chosen precisely because they are likely to cause drama and argue with me, but you know what? It’s no different than me leaving home and walking into the real world where those same kinds of people exist too. So, Mom, I know you don’t understand my happiness at entering what you call “a world of pain,” but it’s my choice. You’ve supported me this far. I hope you’ll continue to support me once you see me on the TV screen.

Q: Which statement accurately describes the evidence presented by this author for why reality shows are not harmful or corrupting to anyone?
Group of answer choices

The author does not present any real evidence, only fallacious logic with questionable conclusions.

The author provides lots of hard, concrete data with statistics to support his argument for reality shows.

The author provides evidence of how much good and charity has come out of reality shows and their contestants.

The author presents the evidence of a clearly thought-out, logical argument for why reality shows are detrimental to all.

Answer 1

out of all of these the 1st statement seems the most appropraite

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't think the 2nd statement is approprate because the author never appeals to logos

I don't like the 3rd statement because charity is never mentioned about reality shows

I don't like the 4th statment because the author is not stating that reality shows are detrimental to all but instead exclusivly for her.

hope this helps :)