Question

My opponent says we should respect the values that have guided us in the past and draw strength from them. But this election isn’t about the past; it’s about the future. I am the candidate that wants to lead us to a better, brighter future. So you can either vote for my opponent and a return to the past, or you can vote progress by voting for me.

Does it commit a fallacy? Does it commit a missing the point fallacy?

Answer 1

The summary according to the given scenario is summarized below.

Step-by-step explanation:

• This same case eventually commits mistakes as well as the seriously lacking moment in time mistakes. That was because supporting in favor of the aforementioned individual will ensure that advancement is not reasonable.
• There seems to be no factual evidence throughout the assumption that the adversary will drag society towards history if any individual is appointed.