Answer:
Since the calculated value of z= -1.421 does not lie in the critical region z >
- 1.96 the null hypothesis is accepted and it is concluded that the treatments result in the same effect.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Let the null and alternate hypothesis be
H0: μa − μb = 0 the treatments result in the same effect
against the claim
Ha: μa − μb ≠ 0 the treatments do not result in the same effect
2) The significance level is set at 0.05
3) The critical region is z = ± 1.96
4) The test statistic
Z= x1`-x2`/ sqrt [( s1²/n1+ s2²/n2)]
Here
x1`= 17 s1= 4 n1= 13
x2`= 19 s2= 3 n2= 12
5) Calculations
Z= x1`-x2`/ sqrt [( s1²/n1+ s2²/n2)]
z= 17-19/sqrt [( 16/13+ 9/12)]
z= -2/1.40739
z= -1.421
6) Conclusion
Since the calculated value of z= -1.421 does not lie in the critical region z >
- 1.96 the null hypothesis is accepted and it is concluded that the treatments result in the same effect.