Answer:
Jackson's "On Indian Removal" and Micheal Ruthledge's "Samuel's Memory" demonstrate how using connotation to your advantage, meticulously constructing phrases in a meaningful way, and writing in a specific tone persuades the audience in the way the writers intended. Both texts present two opposing viewpoints on the same historical event, the Indian Removal Act. The differences between the two pieces demonstrate different approaches to method and language in order to convey their respective points of view. They employ basic persuasion strategies to generate two diametrically opposed stories based on the same occurrence, resulting in two distinct publications.
The varied usage of adjectives by Andrew Jackson and Micheal Ruthledge is a contrast. Many of the descriptive terms appear in Jackson's speech, which he utilizes to highlight his point and what he's attempting to communicate. By doing so, he is attempting to persuade the public that voting for the Indian Removal Act was the correct decision. Throughout the speech, he refers to Indigenous residents in derogatory terms in order to persuade the audience, who was made up of members of Congress, to agree with him. Rutledge, on the other hand, does not use as many adjectives as Jackson does, preferring to use them only when he feels they are required. As a result, his writing is as compelling as Jackson's.
An additional distinction between the two contents is the contrast of Ruthledge's and Jackson's sentence structures. Jackson's sentences are extensive and appear to occur frequently, giving the impression that he is educated, allowing people to trust him and support him. Furthermore, they do not get straight to the point, instead of circling about the main goal, which was the removal of the Indigenous from their territory. Rutledge, on the other hand, employs short, direct phrases that go right to the point. This lends the author credibility by depicting his story as more plain and factual. Rutledge developed a unique structure in which he only used six words in every sentence. Ruthledge's use of plain language and word choice makes the traumatic moments of Samuel's journey appear more severe.
Despite the fact that both Andrew Jackson's and Micheal Ruthledge's records are based on the same event, the Indian Removal, they tell two quite different stories. Rutledge utilizes more harsh phrases with diction and negative connotation, whereas Jackson uses words with delicate diction and connotation. The two-sentence patterns demonstrate the two opposing viewpoints on the Indian Removal Act. While one was too complex in order to spread out the facts, the other was clear and to the point. The texts' extreme two tones range widely from bitter and negative to safe and positive.