Answer:
A customer would save $ 150 on the television during this sale and pay
$ 850.
Reject H0. The data suggests that the true proportion of correct answers to the context-free question is higher than the proportion of right answers to the contextual one
Explanation:
15% of 1000
=0.15 *1000= $ 150
A customer would save $ 150 on the television during this sale.
p1 = the true proportion students who answered the question without context = 168/200
p2 = the true proportion of students who answered the question with context correctly = 147/200
The null and alternate hypotheses are
H0: p1 − p2 = 0 i.e the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context is the same as that for the one with context
against the claim
Ha: p1 − p2 > 0 that is the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context
2) The significance level is set at 0.05
3) The critical region is z > ± 1.645
4) The test statistic
Z= p1-p2/ sqrt [pcqc ( 1/n1+ 1/n2)]
Here p1= 168/200= 0.84
and p2= 147/200=0.735
pc = 168+147/200+200
pc= 315/400= 0.7875
qc= 1-pc= 1-0.7875=0.2125
5) Calculations
Z= p1-p2/ sqrt [pcqc ( 1/n1+ 1/n2)]
z= 0.84-0.735/√ 0.7875*0.2125( 1/200+ 1/200)
z= 0.105/0.0409076
z= 2.5667
6) Conclusion
Since the calculated value of z= 2.5667 lies in the critical region the null hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded that the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.
The value of z is 2.5668.
The value of p is 0.01016