2 Answers

Laxmikant · Answer 1 · 2023-10-04T02:17:55+0000

Final answer:

According to the information provided, the judge questions Mr. Reegan about the alcohol at the party. He states that ``no alcohol was permitted. `

The answer is option ⇒4) No alcohol was permitted.

Step-by-step explanation:

This suggests that the company did not provide alcohol at the party.This implies that the company did not provide alcohol for the event.

Based on this information, it is important to note that the availability or provision of alcohol at the party may affect the element of duty in a negligence case. If no alcohol was permitted or provided by the company, it could potentially weaken Miss Richards' claim that the company breached its duty of care by not fulfilling promises regarding transportation after the party.

The answer is option ⇒4) No alcohol was permitted.

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was:

Elements of Negligence (Part 1)

Miss Richards, the plaintiff, is in court suing her employer, Grotto Inc. Miss Richards is seeking damages for events occurring during and after the company's holiday party. After leaving the party, she was in a car accident and received a ticket for driving under the influence; she feels her company is responsible. She claims the company is responsible because of promises the company broke regarding transportation after the party. Her employer argues that it was Miss Richards' own fault for drinking and driving, and therefore they were not negligent.

Before beginning this exercise, reread the sections of your text regarding elements of negligence in Chapter 9. Recall that to win a negligence case, the plaintiff must prove four elements: (1) duty, (2) breach of duty, (3) causation, and (4) damages. A plaintiff who cannot establish all four of these elements will be denied recovery. Throughout the video, listen to see whether the plaintiff shows these elements of negligence. As you watch the video, answer the questions.