Question

What makes the following sentence a weak argument?

Earbuds are probably doing serious physical damage to their inner eardrums or even the brain itself, but apparently that doesn't bother anyone.
A. The author is not a medical doctor.
B. The sentence is not a weak argument
C. The author is too angry to be persuasive
d. The author is speculating but not providing concrete evidence

Answer 1

D.The author is speculating but not providing concrete evidence

Step-by-step explanation:

Got it right

Answer 2

I would a its D

Step-by-step explanation:

reason being, the author is just saying it to maybe scare you off and where is the proof behind this accusation. Therefore I believe its D if this helps your welcome if not I'm so sorry.