60.7k views
0 votes
In order to justify this claim for the Ferengi a sample of 16 coils is taken. For this sample set, the mean warp phase flux is found to be 73.7 cochranes with a sample measured standard deviation of 12 cochranes. Is this claim justified at the two-sided 95% or 90% levels? (Derive and define the appropriate values to show true or false for each of the levels. Eg. Is the found mean within the allowed range?)

User Dilovar
by
3.6k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

The responses to these question can be defined as follows:

Explanation:


n = 16\\\\ \bar{x}= 73.7\\\\\sigma = 12\\\\a = 0.05\ or\ a = 0.10\\\\H_(o) \ : \mu = 68\\\\H_(a) \ : \mu \\eq 68\\\\a = 0.05\\\\

critical values
=\pm t0.025,15 = \pm 2.131\\\\


(n-1) = 15^(\circ)\\\\a = 0.10\\\\

critical values
= \pm t0.05,15 = \pm 1.753\\\\


(n-1) = 15^(\circ)\\\\

Testing the statistic values:


t = (x-\mu_(0))/( (s)/(โˆš(n)))\\\\


= (73.7-68)/(((12)/(โˆš(16))))\\\\\ = (5.7)/(((12)/(4)))\\\\ = (5.7)/((3))\\\\ = 1.9\\

Test statistic ta
= -1.90\ lies

The critical values
\pm t_(0.05,15) =\pm 1.753

It is in the region of dismissal. We dismiss the 10% significant null hypothesis.


t_a = 1.90 \\\\df = 15\\\\a = 0.05\\\\p-value = 076831\\\\

P - value is greater than the level of significance a= 0.05

Null hypothesis we don't reject. At a 95% level, the claim is justified.


t_a = 1.90\\\\ df = 15\\\\ a = 0.10\\\\p-value = 076831\\\\

P - value below the meaning level a = 0.10, we reject the hypothesis null. At a level of 90% the claim is not justified.

User Alex Shyba
by
3.3k points