Question

Writing an argumentative essay about Sol Painting

An Introduction (with a hook, brief summary of the story and a thesis statement that states your argument as the LAST sentence of the intro)
2 Body paragraphs that begin with a topic sentence, contain at lease one piece of evidence that backs up the topic sentence and one reason that connects the evidence to the main argument
1 body paragraph that contains a counter-argument, at least one piece of evidence for that counter-argument, your refutation of the counter-argument (why your thesis is more valid than the counter-argument)
A conclusion that wraps up the essay.

Answer 1

Admittedly, the proposition is correct in stating that “industrial waste is responsible for most pollution.” I would even go so far as to agree with the proposition’s argument that industrial waste is responsible for the bulk of environmental pollution.

The proposition’s argument that “industrial waste is responsible for most pollution” is a fact that I’m not disputing. What I am disputing is the proposition’s solution. The proposition claims that “when industrial products such as cans, plastics, and chemicals are recycled, the pollution levels decrease significantly.” However, the proposition has presented no credible facts or studies to prove this claim. Even if it was correct that recycling could significantly reduce pollution levels, it’s not the most cost-effective solution.

Money is an important resource that can’t be carelessly spent on unproven recycling programs. Therefore, I propose that the best way to tackle environmental pollution is not recycling but investing heavily in cleaner technologies and energy sources.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

so you want me to write a assay 4 u?

Step-by-step explanation: