Question

(Heredity)Discussion Topic

In some cases, people who test positive for genetic testing can receive
preventive treatments. For example, people who test positive for the breast
cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 can have a preventive mastectomy (breast
removal surgery) before they develop the disease. In other cases, no preventive
treatments are available, but frequent monitoring can help detect a disease
earlier, when it's more easily treated.
What ethical or professional concerns does a health-care professional need to
address when he or she has a patient who wants to prematurely treat a genetic
disease? Do you think genetic testing should be part of normal preventive
healthcare? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Answer:
this is an alternate answer that is simply paraphrased from the first answer (to prevent suspicion of cheating)
Step-by-step explanation:

Discrimination arises owing to the presence of "inferior" genes, which is the ethical or professional dilemma that a health-care provider must face when he or she has a patient who wishes to treat a hereditary condition early. Yes, I agree that genetic testing ought to be a standard component of preventive healthcare because it informs us about inheritable disorders. By treating diseases before they seriously harm the body, this testing can prevent them in the future.

Answer 2

Discrimination occurs due to presence of "inferior" genes

Step-by-step explanation:

Discrimination occurs due to presence of "inferior" genes is the ethical or professional concerns that the health-care professional need to address when he or she has a patient who wants to prematurely treat a genetic disease. Yes, I think that genetic testing should be a part of normal preventive healthcare because this genetic testing provides information about inheritable diseases. This testing can avoid future diseases by treating it before it causes severe damage to the body.