Answer:
2. the use of thermal imager
3. Forth amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
2. The respondent here is the United States government that won in the lower court. They are responding to the arguments of the petitioner. The strongest argument for the respondent is the use of the thermal imager and the Forth amendment. The court presents that thermal imager is not a threat to the privacy of a private activity in a private place.
3. As an attorney to the DLK, I would say that though thermal imager does not seems to be a threat to the privacy of the people, but still according to the Fourth Amendment which protects the privacy of the people of US, the government officials should first issued a warrant from the court before using the thermal imager near the house. As thermal imagers can be used to see things which are not able to see with our normal eyes.