148k views
1 vote
Which of the following sentences from an argumentative essay addresses a

counterclaim?
A. Because it will help reduce traffic, air pollution, and noise pollution
in our town, Easton should limit the amount of nonresidents that
can drive in or through our city.
B. Some argue that restricting outside traffic will hurt Easton
financially, but a study conducted by our chamber of commerce
shows nonresidents contribute only 3 to 5 percent to our
economy
C. Studies by the Hammond Institute for Environmental Studies show
that reducing traffic on Easton's major streets by 50 percent will
likely improve air quality by 70 to 80 percent.
D. The second reason we should restrict nonresident drivers is that it
will go a long way in cutting back the noise pollution that has
become a major issue for Easton's children and elderly.
SUBMIT

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer:

B) Some argue that restricting outside traffic will hurt Easton financially, but a study conducted by our chamber of commerce shows nonresidents contribute only 3 to 5 percent to our economy.

Step-by-step explanation:

User FrankMonza
by
7.6k points
2 votes

Answer: Some argue that restricting outside traffic will hurt Easton financially, but a study conducted by our chamber of commerce shows nonresidents contribute only 3 to 5 percent to our economy.

Step-by-step explanation:

An argumentative essay refers to an essay whereby evidences and facts are used in supporting a claim that is made. A counterclaim simply means an opposing claim that doesn't agree with the claim that's made.

The sentence that addresses a counterclaim is that "Some argue that restricting outside traffic will hurt Easton financially, but a study conducted by our chamber of commerce shows nonresidents contribute only 3 to 5 percent to our economy.

This depicts that despite the claim that the restriction of outside traffic will hurt Easton financially, there's an opposing claim that Easton won't be hurt because nonresidents contribute only 3 to 5 percent to our economy. This is a different view to the claim made, therefore, it's a counterclaim.

User Ludwig Weinzierl
by
8.5k points