Final answer:
The American Revolution is seen by some historians as a rebellion to maintain the status quo, while others view it as a radical social upheaval aiming for greater democracy and equality. It resulted in the independence of the United States and the creation of a new model for democracy with lasting global influence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Was the American Revolution a Revolution or Revolt?
The American Revolution can be described as both a revolution and a revolt, with historical perspectives varying among experts. Some historians view the conflict as a colonial rebellion aimed solely at achieving independence from Britain to maintain the status quo.
This interpretation views colonial society as essentially democratic and believes the Revolution fought to preserve these existing conditions. However, others take a more radical stance, considering it a significant social upheaval triggered by class conflict, aiming to increase democracy and equality among the colonies.
Contextually, nationalism has influenced some historians to describe the Revolution as a radical event that unified colonists in their struggle for liberty against the perceived tyrannical nature of British policies. These views emphasize the transformative nature of the Revolution in shaping a new government system.
The war, primarily led by figures such as George Washington, ended with the surrender of British forces at Yorktown and the signing of the Treaty of Paris, cementing the independence and new democratic ideals of the United States.
In light of the conflict and subsequent establishment of a government not based on monarchy - despite not achieving a full-fledged democracy as reflected in the Constitution of 1789 - the American Revolution led to substantial social upheaval and a new national model of democracy influencing future generations globally.