223k views
4 votes
The race to the bottom scenario of global environmental degradation is explained roughly like this:

A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.
B. Companies seek to reduce their costs of operation on plant and equipment design and this results in higher levels of pollution.
C. Companies seek the lowest market prices on products in order to gain market share, resulting in inferior goods and increased waste and pollution.
D. Companies seek to influence environmental legislation standards to the lowest possible standards in the U.S. in order to maximize profits.
Reset Selection

It is sometimes argued that a nation should not depend too heavily on other countries for supplies of certain key products. This argument is commonly known as the:
A. buy-American argument.
B. anti-dumping argument.
C. national interest argument.
D. self-sufficiency argument.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

A. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits.

D. self-sufficiency argument.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case when there is a race to the bottom scenario so it would be described that the multinational companies that are profit seeking is shifting their production from that countries who have the strong environmental standards to the weak standard countries so that the order would be decreased due to this the profit would increase

In the other case, when the nation is not too much depend on other countries for supplies so this case we called as self-sufficiency argument as they managed themselves rather depending on another

User Jonrobm
by
4.0k points