Final answer:
The less persuasive argument may lack sufficient evidence and fail to counter major points, whereas the more persuasive one provides compelling examples and effectively rebuts counterpoints. A persuasive article excels with a clear thesis, strong reasoning, and addressing counterarguments convincingly.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating the arguments presented in the articles about celebrities as heroes, the persuasive strength of each argument can largely depend on the evidence provided and how effectively it is communicated. The article arguing that celebrities should not be idolized as heroes is generally considered less persuasive if it fails to provide sufficient evidence or counter major points effectively. On the other hand, the article positing that celebrities can be cultural heroes might be more persuasive if it provides compelling examples and addresses potential counterpoints with strong rebuttals.
Good persuasive articles typically engage the reader with a clear thesis, strong reasoning, and a blend of logical, emotional, or ethical appeals. To bolster its persuasive strength, an article can provide specific reasons and examples, such as citing instances where celebrities have inspired widespread positive change or have significantly influenced cultural movements. Moreover, effectively addressing counterarguments demonstrates a deeper understanding of the issue and enhances the author's credibility.
Weak persuasive articles, however, might suffer from a lack of depth in addressing opposing views, employing irrelevant information, or failing to provide a balanced discussion. An article could improve its argument by anticipating objections and responding to them directly, thereby strengthening its position. Appropriately contextualized evidence and a well-structured argument that resonates with the audience are also crucial components of a persuasive essay.