16.0k views
3 votes
What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text

of Churchill's speech?
A. Churchill's voice has a musical quality in the audio, but the text
version reads choppy and concise.
B. Churchill uses sarcasm in the audio version, but sarcasm cannot
be identified in the text version.
O C. Churchill expresses many emotions in the text, but when he
delivers the speech, he does not show great emotion in his voice.
O D. Churchill delivers the speech in an angry tone, but the text version
shows the tone to be serious and inspirational.

What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text of Churchill-example-1
User Anky
by
6.3k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer: C. Churchill expresses many emotions in the text, but when he

delivers the speech, he does not show great emotion in his voice.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Sergio Pardo
by
6.0k points
1 vote

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

Mr. Churchill gave a speech that could inspire a war in angry tone but the written speech or text version of speech quoted that the tone of the speech was a bit serious and inspirational

Hence, option D is correct

User Karlx Swanovski
by
5.9k points