116k views
1 vote
Name at least three current intellectual property challenges faced by IT managers, and explain how managers can prepare for, prevent or mitigate the damage done by each. Explain and support your argument with examples from either the textbook or a peer-reviewed source. Cite all referenced material in APA style.

User JelleP
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

The responses to this question can be defined as follows:

Step-by-step explanation:

Software device designers and landowners should take good care to guarantee whether their area of development is properly protected inside the scope of intellectual property in the quick and extremely competitive technology sector. After all, advanced, interconnected problems involving the convergence of copyright, trademark, company name, and trade secret legislation are protected by the security software scheme.

IT administrators/organizations face copyright problems

Software device functionality or options: copyright does not cover definitions of computer tools and capabilities nor does it cover interfaces. That's why competitors will create a very similar software application that can't be assumed to have violated violations, ciao so because the software system has its own ASCII text file.

Even so, ideas about roles and choices for software applications may well be covered underneath the law. The software system technically could be patented in the Asian world, but in some nations, in conjunction with both the United States. It way is also followed by Asian countries as attached equipment or devices of innovative functions and incredible steps would be deemed patentable under thai law, nevertheless, this unit of such a field is talking about an item by item.

Source code: Typically, the ASCII text is secret untouched and simply revealed when the program has also been publicly released. Throughout the absence of a folder of ASCII text underneath the security protocols, secret law should cover all who accurately reveal, deprive or use corporate data of another party while also not consenting to another party.

Copyright ownership: Except as otherwise agreed in writing, the ownership of the software application created by affiliated workers is owned by the worker under a related arrangement.

This same commission group will, but on the other hand, be accountable for copyright for both the software system developed underneath a service agreement. Designers and their representatives for independent candidates could, nevertheless, accept that perhaps the developers own all the rights to the copyright.

License agreements: Whenever the customer needs a software application to supply an ASCII word document, both parties must clarify whether or not the customer needs this same ASCII text file to be provided, and whether the software state requires to be modified or updated.

This could be substantially different from a licensing deal as a consequence of a computer device sales contract or a similar arrangement for granting copyright to an ASCII text file.

In the case that the entities agree with a software system license agreement that requires the ASCII text file to be revealed for customization and/or the system change, the programmer may adopt a requirement that perhaps the consumer is to remain confidential with both the ASCII text file. Software licensing terms do not prevent landowners from granting alternative groups licenses.

Exclusive license: The software system can be used solely by the dealer. This is not permitted to be used by the licensee and no extra permits can be granted.

The only lease: the software system can only be used by the retailer. A licensor decides not to issue permits and licenses but maintains their right to use the software application.

License not exclusive: the copyright holder could concurrently issue multiple users licenses and even the user could use the software framework.

User Parkerfath
by
7.2k points