Question

Marty, a 16-year-old, contracted with Cream-of-the-Crop Cycles to buy an $8,000 motorcycle. He agreed to make monthly payments until the purchase price plus interest were paid in full. It is three years later and Marty has not disaffirmed the contract and has made regular payments on the cycle since turning 19. Which of the following is correct?

A) The contract is voidable by Marty.
B) The contract is void as soon as it is made.
C) The contract is voidable by Cream-of-the-Crop Cycles.
D) The contract is voidable by either Marty or Cream-of-the-Crop Cycles.

Answer 1

Marty has ratified the contract and is now bound by the terms.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given case as we can see that the Marty was minor and as per the act the eligibility to enter into a contract should be in the age of 18 years or above so here the contract should be voidable but after 3 years he would be 19 years and now he would ratified the contract and now bound with the contract terms

Hence, the above represent the answer