96.3k views
4 votes
Many professional sports are arguing that they need a new stadium to be competitive, as newer stadiums can bring in more fan revenue which can in turn allow teams to buy more expensive players. Some major league baseball teams have built new stadiums in the past decade. Consider the attendance (in millions) in the last year of the old stadium and the first year of the new stadium. Using a sample of 5 randomly selected teams, researchers would like to determine if there is any evidence that attendance levels differ between using old vs new stadiums. The data for these five teams are shown below:

Team Attendance (in millions)
Old Stadium New Stadium
Cincinnati Reds 1.9 2.4
New York Yankees 4.3 3.7
Philadelphia Phillies 2.3 3.3
Seattle Mariners 2.7 2.9
Washington Nationals 1.9 2.3

Required:
a. Calculate the test statistic appropriate to the correct statistical method.
b. Suppose all assumptions were satisfied for valid inference, and the researcher found a statistically significant lower average attendance in the new stadium compared to the old stadium. (This does not mean that this data support this conclusion - this is just hypothetical.) Does this mean that the new stadium caused attendance to decrease? Why or why not?

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

Test statistic = 1.1508

Explanation:

Given the data provided

We have to make a table and find d and d²

From the calculations I did in the attachment

n = 5

d² = 1.81

d = 1.5

The t test statistic = 1.5/1.3038 = 1.1505

B. No the new stadium may not have caused the attendance t decrease in this case. Other factors could be responsible for the low attendance.

Many professional sports are arguing that they need a new stadium to be competitive-example-1
Many professional sports are arguing that they need a new stadium to be competitive-example-2
User Snicolas
by
2.9k points