Final answer:
In George Orwell's 'Animal Farm', human opinions change from skepticism to a complex mix of admiration and rivalry as the pigs adopt human traits. This reflects Orwell's critique of the nature of political systems and the idea of mutual domestication between humans and the systems they create.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question "How have the human's opinions of Animal Farm changed?" refers to the evolution of the human characters' perspectives in George Orwell's novel, Animal Farm. Initially, humans view Animal Farm with skepticism and disdain, as the successful animal rebellion represents a threat to their control and societal structure. However, as the pigs begin to adopt human traits and governance styles, the perceptions of the neighboring humans shift. They start to recognize their own tendencies within the new leadership of Animal Farm, which leads to a complicated mix of admiration and rivalry. This mirrors the dynamics of power and corruption in human societies, and represents Orwell's critique on the nature of political systems.
Understanding the representations of human behavior through allegorical depictions like in Animal Farm provides an insight into human psychology and sociopolitical structures. The novel underscores the idea that humans, though creators of social and political systems, are not immune to being influenced and altered by the systems they create, which can eerily mimic the process of domestication observed in agriculture.
Moreover, the reversal of roles, as implied in the imagery of 'The World Turned Upside Down', further illustrates the unstable nature of power dynamics and the fluidity between dominator and dominated. Through the human-like behavior of the animals in the story, Orwell criticizes not only the governing systems but also comments on the human capacity for self-deception, manipulation, and rationalization in the pursuit of power.