Final answer:
Contrasting perspectives in a narrative, such as those of Mike and Nana, reveal the complexities of characters' views shaped by personal histories and contribute to the story's depth by challenging conventional expectations.
Step-by-step explanation:
By contrasting Mike's and Nana's perspectives in the given paragraphs, the author is likely revealing differences in their personal experiences, beliefs, or attitudes towards a specific event or concept. Differences in point of view can deepen our understanding of each character and add complexity to the narrative. For example, Mike may have a more optimistic view of freedom while Nana sees freedom through the lens of her past hardships, thereby illustrating how personal history can shape one's perception of abstract ideas like freedom.
The text you are referring to suggests a focus on characterization and point of view, which is essential for comparing perspectives. When contrasting characters' perspectives, look for ways in which the text shows evidence of the writer's intent to meet or challenge conventional expectations in rhetorically effective ways. This aspect can be used to analyze how the contrasting perspectives contribute to the narrative's realism or naturalism and reflect the complexity of real-life viewpoints.