Answer:
1) Since the calculated value of t = -0.241640 does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude that there is not enough evidence to show the difference in the mean overall distance of brands.
2) The 95% CI is [-18.587; 1.01242]
Explanation:
The given data is
Brand 1 257 276 260 262 287 271 260 265 283 271
Brand 2 273 281 279 275 271 270 263 267 263 268
Difference d -16 -5 -19 -13 -16 - 01 -3 -2 20 3 ∑ -98
d² 256 25 361 169 256 1 9 4 400 9 ∑1490
1) Let the hypotheses be
H0: ud= 0 against the claim Ha: ud ≠0
2) The degrees of freedom = n-1= 10-1= 9
3) The significance level is 0.05
4) The test statistic is
t= d`/sd/√n
5) The critical region is ║t║≤ t (0.025,9) = ±2.262
Calculations
6) d`= ∑di/n= -98/10= -9.8
Sd²= ∑(di-d`)²/n-1 = 1/n-1 [∑di²- (∑di)²n]
= 1/9[1490-(-9.8)²/10] =1/9 [1490-9.604]= 164.4884
Sd= 12.825
Therefore
t= d`/ sd/√n
t= -9.8/ 12.825/√10
t= -0.764132/3.16227= -0.241640
7) Conclusion:
1) Since the calculated value of t = -0.241640 does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude that there is not enough evidence to show the difference in the mean overall distance of brands.
2) The confidence interval for the difference of two samples can be calculated by
d ` ± td sd/√n
Putting the values
-9.8 ±2.262* 12.825/√10
[-18.587; 1.01242]