79.2k views
5 votes
Question 4 Incorrect answer. Incorrect. Try again. Two suppliers manufacture a plastic gear used in a laser printer. The impact strength of these gears measured in foot-pounds is an important characteristic. A random sample of 10 gears from supplier 1 results in x Overscript bar EndScripts Subscript 1 Baseline equals 289.30 and and another random sample of 16 gears from the second supplier results in x Overscript bar EndScripts Subscript 2 Baseline equals 321.50 and Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of impact strength is different for the two suppliers

User Kaleazy
by
5.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

Since the calculated t = -3.9886 falls in the critical region t ∝/2 ≥±2.101 we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that variance of impact strength is different for the two suppliers

Explanation:

The given data is

Sample1 mean = x1` = 289.3

Sample 1 size = n1= 10

Sample 1 std. dev= s1= 22.5

Sample2 mean = x2` = 321.5

Sample 2 size = n2= 16

Sample 2 std. dev= s2= 21

1)Formulate the null and alternate hypothesis as

H0: σ₁=σ₂ against the claim Ha: σ₁ ≠σ₂

2)The test statistic is

t= (x1`- x2`) / √ s1²/n1+ s2²/n2

where degrees of freedom = d.f=

υ = [s₁²/n1 + s₂²/n2]²/ (s₁²/n1 )²/ n1-1 + (s₂²/n2)²/n2-1

3) the significance level chosen is ∝= 0.05

4) Calculating the d.f

υ = [s₁²/n1 + s₂²/n2]²/ (s₁²/n1 )²/ n1-1 + (s₂²/n2)²/n2-1

= [21²/10 + 22.5²/16] / [(21/²10)² /9 + (22.5²/16)²/15]

= 18

5) the critical region for ∝= 0.05 for 18 d.f = ±2.101 for two sided test

6) t= (x1`- x2`) / √ s1²/n1+ s2²/n2

t= 289.3- 321.5/√21²/10 + 22.5²/16

t= -32.2/√44.1+31.64

t= -32.2/8.0729

t= -3.9886

7) Conclusion

Since the calculated t = -3.9886 falls in the critical region t ∝/2 ≥±2.101 we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that variance of impact strength is different for the two suppliers

User Greg Franko
by
6.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.