Final answer:
The biological perspective would be least helpful for explaining the increase in dissociative identity disorder rates, attributed more to cultural and diagnostic factors, but is relevant to biological aspects of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and the fear response.
Step-by-step explanation:
A biological perspective in psychology emphasizes the physical and biological bases of behavior, including genetic, hormonal, and neurochemical explanations. This approach would be least helpful for explaining the dramatic increase in reported cases of dissociative identity disorder (DID) over the past 40 years. The rise in DID cases has been attributed more to cultural and diagnostic factors than to biological changes. On the other hand, the biological perspective is quite relevant to the prevalence of schizophrenia, the biological underpinnings of fear (like the fear of snakes), fluctuations in mood in bipolar disorder, and the high correlations found in psychological disorders through twin studies. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, for example, have well-researched biological components, such as malfunctions in dopaminergic neurons in schizophrenia and neurotransmitter imbalances in bipolar disorder, making the biological perspective very useful in these contexts.