Question

Madison believed that a republic would be better than a pure democracy for a large and populous nation. In at least 100 words, describe how Madison defined pure democracy. Then provide one or two examples of situations in which a pure democracy could be the best type of government.

Answer 1

ffcvxvcvxvxcvcvxvcx

Step-by-step explanation:

I think James Madison would definitely describe modern corporations as a faction. It seems like today there are almost no companies that hold the common good as a priority. Many companies can be taken as an example here, they do not care about the environment, they do not care of the sweatshops that they have children working in to make their products, they only care about the money they're making and the fact that they are rich. Madison states how part of the reason factions are made is because they are focused on property and money, which is very similar to modern-day corporations.

Answer 2

Madison defined pure democracy or direct democracy as a form of government in which each American citizen is allowed to vote and their vote is used to decide what kind of laws should be in place rather than a body of representatives deciding what laws should be in place. Madison did not like the idea of pure democracy because he thought that political cliques or factions would form and those biased groups would sway the votes of what individuals actually wanted to vote for. A pure democracy could be the best democracy because the government in that case wouldn't be able to hide anything from their people as well as people will be able to make direct choices that benefit their life.

Step-by-step explanation: