228k views
4 votes
What is the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment?

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

the constitution limits individual rights

Step-by-step explanation:

The significance of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion that words creating a "clear and present danger" are not protected by the First Amendment is that "the constitution limits individual rights."

This is because the Supreme Court's translation of the First Amendment in some cases or instances relinquishes individual freedoms in the presence of the need to maintain social order.

This is evident in the case of Schenck v. the United States in the year 1919

User Mithun Arunan
by
3.3k points