Register

I really need ur help guys. Joe Smith was found not guilty of robbing a store. When Joe was tried in state court a second time for the same crime, he was found guilty and sent t…

I really need ur help guys. Joe Smith was found not guilty of robbing a store. When Joe was tried in state court a second time for the same crime, he was found guilty and sent t…
207k views
0 votes
I really need ur help guys.

Joe Smith was found not guilty of robbing a store. When Joe was tried in state court a second time for the same crime, he was found guilty and sent to state prison.

Joe’s lawyer believes that Joe has been wrongly imprisoned. What can the lawyer do?

A. protest against an unfair ex post facto law
B.petition for a writ of habeas corpus
C. demand Joe’s “due process” rights
D.petition for a writ of certiorari

User Tommy
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

6 votes
I believe the answer is C, since they are convicted him on a crime he was already tried for and double jeopardy isn’t allowed, demanding due process rights means respecting all legal rights owed to Joe, including no double jeopardy.
User LucasS
by
8.6k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
Link Copied!