Answer:
Option b: Consider whether, in the absence of a contingency-fee option, even people with meritorious cases are much less likely to initiate litigation if they believe they might incur large legal fees
Step-by-step explanation:
Contract is known as a formal agreement between persons usually written or unwritten form that holds both party that are involved to do or not to do a certain thing. In legal terms, a valid contract requires an offer and an acceptance of that offer, and, in common law countries, due or full consideration is done.
Contingency Fee
Lawyer charges a percentage of what a client wins in the case. The client pays nothing but expenses if the case is lost. That is, a legal fee (30-40%) and expenses of the lawsuit are only collected if there is a successful outcome. If unsuccessful no fee or expenses are paid to the lawyer.
Major purpose of the contingency fee is create an open means or an access to the courts for all people that is not just the rich, even with their financial station.
Option b shows that the argument fails to consider how the amount of lawsuits brought might get impacted if the contingency-fee system is not used. This leads to the number of lawsuits that is brought against doctors will not increase that is, it is flawed.