128k views
2 votes
5 Select the correct text in the passage. Which passage in the Miranda v. Arizona decision requires police officers to tell people they are arresting that a lawyer will be available to the arrested person? The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he/she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says may be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that if he/she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him/her. Reset Next​

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Chris Moschini
by
5.2k points
4 votes

Answer: "the person must be clearly informed that he/she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney"

Explanation: This passage states that the person must be informed they have the right to consult with an attorney by a police officer. Also, it's the correct answer on Plato.

5 Select the correct text in the passage. Which passage in the Miranda v. Arizona-example-1
User Frixhax
by
5.4k points