54.1k views
5 votes
Which of the following is a valid judgment of the year 2000 presidential election?

A) If the recount had happened in Texas instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
B) If the recount had happened in Alaska instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
C) If the recount had happened in New York instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.
D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Which of the following is a valid judgment of the year 2000 presidential election-example-1
User Lizzie
by
5.9k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Step-by-step explanation:

I got it "Correct"

User VikrantMore
by
5.6k points
6 votes

Answer:

D) If the recount had happened in California instead of Florida, no delay in naming the winner would have been necessary.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this will help

User Cquezel
by
6.0k points