Answer:
Based on the confidence interval, the method appears to not bring expected results
Explanation:
The given parameters are;
The number of babies in the study, n = 620 babies
The number of girls in the study sample = 341 girls
The proportion of girls in the study sample,
= 341/620 = 0.55
At 99% confidence level, we have the critical z = 2.576;
The confidence interval is given by the following formula;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21fc8/21fc8a2dfbd6e0be37ccca8ebabdeeb4e685ff8d" alt="CI=\hat{p}\pm z* \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p} \cdot (1-\hat{p})}{n}}"
Plugging in the values of the variables, we get;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f818/8f8181275b90d3f2fb62f7682625830a6c6d18b8" alt="CI=0.55\pm 2.576* \sqrt{(0.55 * (1-0.55))/(620)} \approx 0.55 \ \pm 5.14680 * 10^(-2)"
Therefore, 0.498532 < p < 0.601468
Based on the result of the confidence interval, we can be 99% sure that the true mean is between 0.498532 and 0.601468, therefore, given that the range includes a true mean of 0.5 or 50% probability of conceiving a girl, which is the percentage predicted by genetics, the method appears ineffective