167,289 views
44 votes
44 votes
What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text

of Churchill's speech?
A. Churchill's voice has a musical quality in the audio, but the text
version reads choppy and concise.
B. Churchill uses sarcasm in the audio version, but sarcasm cannot
be identified in the text version.
O C. Churchill expresses many emotions in the text, but when he
delivers the speech, he does not show great emotion in his voice.
O D. Churchill delivers the speech in an angry tone, but the text version
shows the tone to be serious and inspirational.

What do some critics see as a notable difference between the audio and text of Churchill-example-1
User Rtperson
by
2.9k points

2 Answers

22 votes
22 votes

Answer: C. Churchill expresses many emotions in the text, but when he

delivers the speech, he does not show great emotion in his voice.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Bhavin Rana
by
3.1k points
13 votes
13 votes

Answer:

Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

Mr. Churchill gave a speech that could inspire a war in angry tone but the written speech or text version of speech quoted that the tone of the speech was a bit serious and inspirational

Hence, option D is correct

User Protob
by
2.6k points