Final answer:
The book "War Girls" might have threatened political power structures by challenging traditional gender roles and advocating for women's military service. It pressured opponents of female service to reconsider their position as anti-patriotic, while supporters emphasized women's service as a patriotic act that did not infringe on men's roles but rather supported the war effort.
Step-by-step explanation:
The book "War Girls" may have been perceived as a threat to the political power structures of the era due to its challenge to traditional gender roles. Female service members were often displayed in popular culture as ill-suited for military roles, through cartoons and stereotypes that suggested their incompatibility with service. However, advocates of women's military service reframed this participation as an act of patriotism, often putting those who opposed it on the defensive. By showcasing their service as a continuation of their roles in supporting the family and the nation, and by advocating for equal military status and benefits, women's advocates challenged the notion that the military—and by extension, certain aspects of society—should be exclusively male domains.
During World War II, this tension between traditional gender roles and emerging new roles for women manifested in various ways. Women in the military disrupted the conventional idea that men were the sole protectors, potentially altering society's view on masculinity and traditional gender roles. Advocates for women's military service, like Ohio congresswoman Frances Bolton, assured that women would assist and not compete with men, while still championing for benefits and full military status. Furthermore, Eleanor Roosevelt, another proponent of women's military service, supported initiatives for female enlistment which ultimately worked against entrenched opposition.