107k views
5 votes
Would you rather...... justify your answer. climb a hill that has a slope of 4/4 or climb a hill that has a slope of 1/3

1 Answer

5 votes
To understand this question, let’s create some Mathematical examples to illustrate the question.

First, we know that slope is the ratio of the change in y over the change in x, or more commonly known as rise over run. Remember, a ratio is a comparison between two quantities. So, let’s view the slope as a ratio. Since the scenario is climbing a hill, we can use the ratio of elevation gained per minute as the slope.

Slope: elevation (ft.)/minute

This would mean that a slope of 4/4 is 4 feet gained per 4 minutes, which simplifies to 1 feet gained per minute. A slope of 1/3 would mean 1 foot gained per 3 minutes. Consequently, you have two options: you can gain 1 foot per minute or 1 foot per 3 minutes. If you were to climb at 1 foot per minute, you would summit the hill in less time (1/3 of the time it would take to climb the 1/3 slope); however, this is a steeper slope and would require more energy. If you were to climb the hill at 1 foot per 3 minutes, you would ascend the hill 3 times longer than the 1 foot per minute slope; however, you would use less energy at the summit.

So, this is up to you: would you rather climb in 1/3 if the time but used a majority (or all) of your energy, or would you rather climb the hill 3 times longer but have energy remaining?
User Ilyakhov
by
9.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.