Answer:
There are two types of argument deductive meaning a top-down strategy where you get to a conclusion based on a presumption that something is true. The opposite of a deductive argument is an inductive argument. You can draw inferences based on the observations thanks to the bottom-up methodology used in this method.
Step-by-step explanation:
A strong premise underpins a persuasive argument. It's just a bad argument if it isn't solid and convincing. Understanding the different forms of arguments is essential to crafting an effective argument.
A solid premise for the conclusion serves as the foundation of a deductive argument. It's a top-down strategy where you get to a conclusion based on a presumption that something is true. Police typically utilise this method to solve crimes: They have a suspect in mind based on prior knowledge that isn't immediately relevant to the case, and they use that knowledge to develop their theory that the suspect is guilty.
Deductive arguments are the antithesis of inductive arguments. You can draw conclusions based on his observations thanks to this bottom-up approach. Inductive arguments, the more common of the two, move from the particular to the universal. They create a pattern using information and observations. Philosophers and sociologists use this argument to get the right conclusions for their research.