80.8k views
3 votes
ASAPIn the space provided, propose an argument for or against the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1789. Establish

yourself as a Federallst or Anti-Federalist and give evidence supporting your argument. Your argument should address
the views of the opposing side, as well.

User Jdero
by
4.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Argument for Ratifying the U.S. Constitution in 1789 (Federalist):

The ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1789 is essential for the preservation of our nation and its citizens. The Constitution provides a strong and unified government that will protect our rights and promote the general welfare. Federalists recognize that a strong central government is necessary to ensure the safety of the nation, while maintaining the sovereignty of the individual states. The Constitution also provides a structure for the operation of the government and a system of checks and balances to prevent one branch from having too much power. Moreover, a unified government can provide stability, allowing us to engage in commerce and diplomacy with other nations, and promote economic growth.

We recognize the valid concerns of the Anti-Federalists, that a strong central government could potentially lead to a tyranny of the majority. We believe, however, that the Constitution has provided adequate protections to ensure the rights of individuals will not be trampled upon, such as the Bill of Rights, separation of powers, and a system of checks and balances. Ratifying the Constitution is the best way to ensure the safety of our nation and its citizens, while still preserving their rights and freedoms.

User Victor Bruno
by
4.7k points