86.1k views
2 votes
PLEASE HELP

Question

Background: As you recall, Outliers explores the roles of opportunity and legacy in the story of success. Much of the book also dissects and debunks commonly-held views of success. Even though some of Gladwell’s assertions are debatable, the claim below is clearly primitive and incomplete.



Your task: Respond to the claim below by describing what is missing/incorrect in the person’s claim and offering a more accurate explanation using Gladwell’s theories. For your response, interpret and show how two specific, text-based ideas (theories, examples, experiments, historic references, etc.) support a more accurate understanding of the issue. Notice that you have a choice of which claim you chose to respond to. Please indicate which option you have selected at the beginning of your response.


Option #1: “American schools just don’t work.”


OR


Option #2: "Asians are naturally better at math."

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Option #1: "American schools just don't work."This claim is missing/incorrect because it ignores the role of opportunity and legacy in the story of success. According to Gladwell's theories, success is not simply a matter of innate talent or ability, but is also shaped by the opportunities and advantages that individuals have access to. This means that the performance of American schools cannot be fully understood in isolation, but must also be considered in the context of the broader social and economic factors that shape students' opportunities and experiences.One text-based idea that supports a more accurate understanding of this issue is the concept of the "10,000 Hour Rule," which Gladwell introduces in Outliers. This theory suggests that it takes approximately 10,000 hours of dedicated practice to achieve mastery in a particular field or discipline. This means that success is not simply a matter of innate talent, but also depends on the amount of time and effort that individuals are able to devote to developing their skills and abilities.Another text-based idea that supports a more accurate understanding of this issue is the concept of "cultural legacies," which Gladwell discusses in the context of the success of Asian immigrants in the United States. Gladwell argues that the cultural values and practices of certain groups, such as the strong emphasis on education and hard work within many Asian cultures, can shape the opportunities and outcomes that individuals experience. This means that the performance of American schools cannot be fully understood in isolation, but must also be considered in the context of the cultural legacies and values that shape students' experiences.Overall, the claim that "American schools just don't work" is primitive and incomplete because it ignores the role of opportunity and legacy in the story of success. A more accurate explanation would take into account the complex interplay of social, economic, and cultural factors that shape students' opportunities and outcomes, as well as the role of dedicated practice and hard work in achieving success.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Resley Rodrigues
by
4.2k points