Question

Consider the following argument: Any piece of software that is in the public domain may be copied without permission or fee. But that cannot be done in the case of software under copyright. So, software under copyright must not be in the public domain. The conclusion of the argument is:

Answer 1

The conclusion of the argument is that software under copyright is not in the public domain based on legislation protecting intellectual property, which requires authorization to use copyrighted material.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion of the argument is that software under copyright must not be in the public domain. This is based on the premises that software in the public domain can be copied without permission, whereas copyrighted software requires authorization for copying. Copyright is a form of protection provided by the laws of the United States for original works of authorship, which covers literary, dramatic, musical, and other intellectual properties. It legally prevents others from reproducing, displaying, or performing the work without the right holder's permission. State and federal governments have enacted laws protecting intellectual property, including copyrights and patents, to safeguard the economic rights of creators and prevent plagiarism or unauthorized use.

Answer 2

"software under copyright must not be in the public domain"

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion of his argument is "software under copyright must not be in the public domain". This combines the two premises that were stated before it in order to form a logical outcome based on the premises. In the case of logic, this would basically be an

IF A and IF B, Then C

type of logic, in which A is "Public Domain Work can be copied", B is "Software under Copyright cannot be copied", and C is the conclusion which would be "software under copyright must not be in the public domain"