211k views
0 votes
Prove that (1234) is not the product of 3-cycles. Generalize

User Achiash
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

The permutation (1234) is not a 3-cycle

Explanation:

  • To prove that (1234) is not the product of 3-cycles, we can consider the possible 3-cycles that could be used to generate (1234). If we use the 3-cycle (123), we get the permutation (1324). If we use the 3-cycle (124), we get the permutation (1432). If we use the 3-cycle (134), we get the permutation (1423). None of these permutations is equal to (1234), so (1234) cannot be the product of 3-cycles.
  • To generalize this result, we can consider any permutation of n elements. If the permutation involves fewer than three elements, it cannot be the product of 3-cycles because a 3-cycle involves three elements. If the permutation involves more than three elements, it cannot be the product of 3-cycles because a 3-cycle cannot rearrange more than three elements. Therefore, any permutation of n elements that involves more or fewer than three elements cannot be the product of 3-cycles.

If you have any further questions let me know:))

User Rahul Agrawal
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories