Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The rich would be favorable to the new instrument (Constitution) because it protected their wealth and property. The Constitution included provisions that ensured that debts and contracts would be honored, which would benefit those who had accumulated wealth and had entered into financial agreements. Additionally, the Constitution established a strong central government that could effectively regulate trade and commerce, which would benefit those with business interests.
The poor and the states' righters would be unfavorable to the new instrument (Constitution) because they saw it as a threat to their interests. The poor may have been concerned that the Constitution would not adequately address their needs or protect their rights, and they may have feared that it would strengthen the power of the wealthy at their expense. States' righters may have opposed the Constitution because it established a strong central government that could potentially encroach on the powers and autonomy of the states. They may have viewed the Constitution as a threat to their sovereignty and independence.