Answer:
The case of Mincey v. Arizona (1978)
Step-by-step explanation:
The case of Mincey v. Arizona (1978) established that police must obtain search warrants if they want to make subsequent return visits to a crime scene. In this case, the police entered a man's home without a warrant to investigate a homicide, and then returned to the scene several times over the course of four days to conduct further searches. The Supreme Court ruled that the police's actions were unconstitutional, as the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court held that the police must obtain a warrant before conducting any subsequent searches of a crime scene, unless there are exigent circumstances that justify bypassing the warrant requirement. This decision established an important precedent for protecting the rights of individuals against unreasonable search and seizure by the police.