Question

PLease help me

Which statement BEST describes the main argument against judicial activism?
Responses
A It is an interpretation of law that is not based on the Constitution as it is written.It is an interpretation of law that is not based on the Constitution as it is written.
B It is an effort to ensure the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land.It is an effort to ensure the Constitution is no longer the supreme law of the land.
C It is a perspective that views the Constitution as a living document.It is a perspective that views the Constitution as a living document.
D It is an effort to interpret the Constitution as it applies to modern life.

Answer 1

Answer: A. It is an interpretation of law that is not based on the Constitution as it is written.

Step-by-step explanation:

The main argument against judicial activism is that it is an interpretation of law that is not based on the Constitution as it is written. Judicial activists are often accused of using their personal beliefs and values to interpret the Constitution, rather than following the original intent of the founders or the text of the document itself. Critics argue that this approach undermines the rule of law and can lead to arbitrary or inconsistent decisions by the courts.