Question

The first question requires you to read Case Study 2 on Page 528: The Arbitration Case of Jesse Stansky

Instead of the questions in the book, answer these:

1. In 5 or 6 sentences, write a standard for Professional Conduct as it might be defined in an employee handbook. Provide at least 3 examples of conduct that would be considered unprofessional.

2. Going back to the original facts of the case (ignore the standard for Professional Conduct that you wrote in Q1), if you were the arbitrator, how would you rule in this case? In at least 2 paragraphs (4-5 sentences each), explain your decision. Be sure to be specific as you explain your ruling. Imagine that you have to relay your decision to the two parties, and you want your reasoning to convince them that your ruling is sound.

Answer 1

1. Professional conduct in the workplace is defined as the behavior and attitudes that are expected of employees in order to create and maintain a positive and respectful work environment. Examples of unprofessional conduct include:
Failing to follow company policies and procedures
Displaying disrespectful or inappropriate behavior towards coworkers or customers
Engaging in disruptive or violent behavior in the workplace
Misusing company resources, such as technology or equipment

2.Based on the facts of the case, I would rule in favor of Phoenix Semiconductor and uphold the termination of Jesse Stansky. The altercation between Stansky and Lindekin was a clear violation of company policy and the employee handbook, which prohibits fighting on the job. Stansky's behavior was unprofessional and disruptive to the work environment, and the decision to terminate him was appropriate given the circumstances.
Additionally, Stansky's history of disciplinary warnings and previous suspension for a systems control error shows that he has a pattern of disregarding company policies and procedures. Given this evidence, it is reasonable to conclude that Stansky's termination was justified and not arbitrary or discriminatory.

Overall, I believe that Phoenix Semiconductor acted in accordance with their policies and the law, and that the termination of Jesse Stansky was justified.